A lawyer for Hope Solo filed a notice with a court indicating the former United States goalkeeper wants to object to the settlement of the equal pay lawsuit between her former teammates and the U.S. Soccer Federation.

Solo sued the USSF in August 2018 alleging violations of the federal Equal Pay Act and sex status discrimination.

– Murray: USWNT-USSF equal pay settlement – what it means

While Solo’s case has not progressed to trial, players led by Alex Morgan filed suit against the USSF the following year under the Equal Pay Act and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. Those players and the USSF reached a proposed $24 million settlement this spring, and U.S. District Judge R. Gary Klausner in Los Angeles has scheduled a Dec. 5 hearing for final approval.

As part of the settlement, the USSF signed collective bargaining agreements with the unions for the women’s and men’s national teams calling for equal pay.

A.J. de Bartolomeo, a lawyer for Solo, filed a notice of appearance Tuesday to represent Solo as a class member and objector to the settlement.

“It’s unfair to ask players to accept as ‘fair, adequate and reasonable’ a settlement in which the only thing that is described and explained with certainty is how much the lawyers will be paid,” Solo said in a statement.

Solo cited $7.9 million of the $22 million settlement fund as going to lawyers.

“Without knowing how much each player — including me for our Title VII claims — will be paid, or when we will get paid, it’s impossible for players to determine whether or not the proposed settlement and whatever payment we each receive is fair, adequate or reasonable,” she said.

The USSF had no immediate comment, spokesman Neil Buethe said.

“This historic resolution has been recognized as one of the greatest victories for equal pay,” Molly Levinson, a spokeswoman for the group of suing players, said in a statement. “We look forward to the court’s final approval hearing.”

When the settlement was agreed to in February, Solo posted a tweet calling it “heartbreaking and infuriating,” while also suggesting it was not a win for the players involved.

“Read the fine print. ‘Contingent upon the negotiation of a new collective bargaining agreement,'” Solo wrote on Feb. 23, 2022. “It doesn’t exist yet and is not guaranteed.

“If the players had ever been successful in negotiating an equal CBA, there would’ve been no reason to sue the federation in the first place.”

Products You May Like

Articles You May Like

Messi breaks Maradona’s World Cup goals tally
Van Gaal: Dutch 1st half vs. US ‘unacceptable’
A way-too-early look at the USMNT depth chart for 2026 World Cup
Croatia reach World Cup last 16 as Belgium’s golden generation stay trophy-less
Red Stars owner Whisler selling stake in club

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *